POKERSITES ARE SELLING OUT!

[Blowup Doll]

Why is that bad for you? People who like both poker and BJ want to have it all on one site. I don't play BJ, but it doesn't bother me that a site has it.

[iSTRONG]

The traditional view is that BJ tables are bad because fish lose their money to the house instead of us good players.

IMO Blackjack is reponsible for many good players (many 2+2ers dare I say) going busto, and it leaves all the fish for me & me alone.

[SilverLining1]

Right - because, before, those sites were all about giving people opportunities to play great poker and to enrich their minds. I mean, jeez - wake up, man. Every other hand in a Pokerstars tournament is A(x) v. A (x-1).

[Mike Jett]

I support it, for the simple reason that i'd rather take someones money who's clearly interested in the game we're playing.

I think blackjack filters out the degenerate gamblers, who have families to feed but choose to risk their rent.

(please, let me keep my illusion)

[-zero-]

[ QUOTE ]
Right - because, before, those sites were all about giving people opportunities to play great poker and to enrich their minds. I mean, jeez - wake up, man. Every other hand in a Pokerstars tournament is A(x) v. A (x-1).

[/ QUOTE ]

You are an idiot.

[costanza_g]

[ QUOTE ]
I mean, jeez - wake up, man. Every other hand in a Pokerstars tournament is A(x) v. A (x-1).

[/ QUOTE ]

This is hilarious on so many levels. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[boc4life]

[ QUOTE ]
I mean, jeez - wake up, man. Every other hand in a Pokerstars tournament is A(x) v. A (x-1).

[/ QUOTE ]

AND THEN X-1 ALWAYS HITS THE RIVER AM I RIGHT LOL?

[Machiavelii]

[ QUOTE ]
Every other hand in a Pokerstars tournament is A(x) v. A (x-1).

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm confused; A is a function of x?