|
|
|
|
#1
05-01-2006, 04:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
goofy,
"This makes no sense considering that Samaire is absolutely nothing like any of the girls you mentioned, nor is she anywhere near being considered in the same class as them." MAXIM HOT 100- 2005 7. Angelina Jolie 12. Eva Mendez 18. Jessica Biel 23. Kate Beckinsale 53. Keira Knightley 55. Samaire Armstrong 67. Kristin Kreuk [Kate Hudson] [Elisha Cuthbert] Please STFU, thx. 
|
|
#3
05-01-2006, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
[ QUOTE ]
goofy, "This makes no sense considering that Samaire is absolutely nothing like any of the girls you mentioned, nor is she anywhere near being considered in the same class as them." MAXIM HOT 100- 2005 7. Angelina Jolie 12. Eva Mendez 18. Jessica Biel 23. Kate Beckinsale 53. Keira Knightley 55. Samaire Armstrong 67. Kristin Kreuk [Kate Hudson] [Elisha Cuthbert] Please STFU, thx. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, who cares? I don't read Maxim, and even if I did, look at some other choices: Paris Hilton #20?? Nicole Richie #37?? What does being on that list prove in the face of choices like that? Go ask your average Joe on the street who [ QUOTE ] KEIRA KNIGHTLEY, KATE BECKINSALE, ANGELINA JOLIE, KATE HUDSON, EVA MENDES, KRISTEN KREUK, ELISHA CUTHBERT AND JESSICA BIEL [/ QUOTE ] are and they'll probably know, and agree that they're "super hot." Ask them who Samaire Armstrong is, and whether they think she's "super hot", and you'll get a bunch of blank stares. That is what being in the upper echelon of female hotness means, not some dumb list published by a magazine.
|
|
#4
05-01-2006, 04:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
goofy,
It doesn't matter if anyone knows who she is or not. Show anyone with two testicles a picture of this girl and they will agree that she is beyond super-hot. You are fighting a losing battle.
|
|
#5
05-01-2006, 05:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
goofy,
"Ask them who Samaire Armstrong is, and whether they think she's "super hot", and you'll get a bunch of blank stares. That is what being in the upper echelon of female hotness means, not some dumb list published by a magazine. " That is also a stupid statement. They also won't know tons of the names of the chicks in the SI Swimsuit Issue or Victoria's Secret catalogue or models in general, but that doesn't stop them from being super hot.
|
|
#6
05-01-2006, 05:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
Claire Danes?
I'm not sure where she fits on the scale. She is by no means smoking hot, but she's not ugly either.
|
|
#7
05-01-2006, 05:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
 Natalie Gulbis
|
|
#8
05-01-2006, 05:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
[ QUOTE ]
Natalie Gulbis [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, doesn't qualify. She'd be a nice pick for "hot chicks that aren't super well known" though.
|
|
#9
05-01-2006, 05:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
goofy,
"She is as much of a sex symbol as a hot girl that you see walking down the street. " It's like you're taking more and more dumb pills.
|
|
#10
05-01-2006, 05:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Women you\'d nail but aren\'t considered as \"super hot\" by most-NSFW
No brainer Zelda from Pet Semetary is the hottest. Samara from the Ring is a close second if youre into younger chicks.....
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
