![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really wonder what your main goal was betting the river in position. The best that you could hope for is a call from a weaker hand, which seems very unlikely to me.
so you bet the river putting an extra $1100 on the line: 1. he calls you with a weaker hand (very unlikely in my opinion) + $1100 2. he calls with the better hand - $1100 3. he comes over the top with the better hand - $1100 4. he comes over the top wth a weaker hand (you cant call) -$1100 I dont really see the proffit in betting out on the river in position in a hand where you dont really know where you stand. I say check it. I think you played this hand perfectly btw and i like your hand analysis |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thats quite the mathematical analysis.
Clearly the OP beleives that #1 is the most likely situation, and thats why he thinks its neutral or +EV. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
this just seems the most logical way to make this decision. However, if strassa is so sure that he is in front and will be called much more often by a weak hand, of course this is the best move. I just don't see, given the way this hand was played, how he can be so sure.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
4. he comes over the top wth a weaker hand (you cant call) -$1100 [/ QUOTE ] Good to know folding the winner only costs you the river action. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
strassa,
the answer is to play hu. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|