Re: That\'s two in two days
[ QUOTE ]
slider doesn't have a clue what he posted ? That might be a start. Considering TAGs(nits) should have WWsf of well above LAGs if they actually knew how to play postflop. Oh wait, maybe THATS why I think LAG vs TAG is a dumb debate.
[/ QUOTE ]
I find it really silly that a high WWSF is universally praised as the golden standard of a good player without any regard to game conditions whatsoever. It seems to be just the new passing fad, like relentless light 3betting was a short while ago. Is there some flaw in my simple reasoning below?
Barring an ultra tight preflop range, you're WWSF will be high if you bluff a lot. Bluffing a lot is optimal in games where your opponents fold too much. Versus opponents who call too much, the optimal style is to tighten up, bluff less and value bet made hands extremely hard, netting you less pots but more money.
Have I missed something?
|
11-10-2007, 06:24 AM
Threaded Mode