Do I Misunderstand The Double Slit Experiment

[Max Raker]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

For this thread we probably shouldn't mention the Afshar experiment. Most people I've talked to have serious doubts about the setup and conclusion. Even if the Afshar experiment is correct I still think 4 would be wrong since it could be used to send information faster than C.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm actually inclined to agree [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img] I only really brought it up, because as it is you cant say for sure that its invalid or for that matter that it is.

And sending information faster than C is totally ok, as long as its not classical information (spooky action at a distance already says that information can travel faster than C).

[/ QUOTE ]

The way it is worded now, it seems that I could send information. In the EPR paradox you can't send information so it is not a problem.

In 4, i could take the pictures far away and flip a coin. Heads I destroy them, tails I look at them. You can look at the screen after some time has passed and you will know if I flipped heads or tails. Am I wrong or does this make sense?