Longshot Theoretical Question: Paul v Hillary

[John Kilduff]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What would happen is this: Ron Paul would get slaughtered because his platform explicitly includes not giving away the store to corporations and other special interests. Hillary will do the usual thing and raise taxes in order to give the money to the rich. She'll get all the support of the rich and of the dupes who think raising taxes makes things "fair".

natedogg

[/ QUOTE ]

This logic kind of fails if he's already won the primary since by the same logic it should have been impossible for him to win the primary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough. But it's an exercise in absurdism to imagine Ron Paul as the republican candidate, because of that fact. The same reasons apply to why he won't get the nomination.

All the major candidates are mostly a collection of special interest give-aways. Whichever special interests you'd like to see take money from the poor, just pick the candidate who is in bed with them and you've got your man.

Ron Paul represents the complete absence of special interest payoffs, and thus he cannot win.

natedogg

[/ QUOTE ]

A LOT of Americans are sick of politics as usual and the usual bullcrap served up by our politicians. Special interests are one thing but the average American is fed up with all the baloney; see approval ratings too.

The average American is starting to see that we are getting into real trouble with inflation, the dollar, oil prices, the Iraq war, loss of civil liberties, and more. I don't think the average American has much confidence in any of the frontrunners or the administration or even in Congress as a whole (which almost routinely flouts the will of the American people).

All of this to me means that if Ron Paul's message can really reach enough people, and if they have the chance to truly explore and understand it, he has an actual chance to win.

Grassroots America can overcome the lobbies if grassroots America really gets united and activated behind something. Grassroots America got rid of the phony and seditious "not an amnesty" immigration bill, and grassroots America can overcome a great deal more if united. Ron Paul's message (and the honesty of the man himself) just might be capable of uniting much of America.

It's a bit surprising to me that so many people have a default stance of defeatism when it comes to a candidate with genuine integrity and with good basic ideas and whose past record comports with those things. Talking out of both sides of one's mouth isn't necessarily a prerequisite for holding political office, but a lot of people are acting like a real person hasn't a chance.

Maybe you don't realize that much of America may be nearly as fed up, worried and lacking confidence in government as you are. People know something is wrong and that it isn't going to be fixed by the way the current system is working, or by more of the same, or by more of the same candidates which are all basically alike with just a little variation thrown in.

All it takes is a spark people can believe in, and Ron Paul and his message may be that spark. If he can keep raising money like this he won't need special interest money for his campaign.

Thanks for reading.