|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: who likes | |||
| check/call |
   
|
1 | 8.33% |
| bet/call |
  
|
5 | 41.67% |
| bet/3b |
  
|
5 | 41.67% |
| check/raise |
  
|
1 | 8.33% |
| bet/fold (NITS) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
10-30-2007, 10:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA hand, call river lead?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Assuming you have more money offline, I would recommend getting a good coach immediately. Invest $5-6k now and it will pay off quick. [/ QUOTE ] Wow, that's a lot of coaching for a 25 or 50nl player. [/ QUOTE ] I'm just saying, anyone who wants to improve quickly and has the money should definitely make the investment now, rather than spend MONTHS struggling at SSNL like most players do. $5-6k is only one decent month at 1/2 so the coaching pays for itself relatively quickly. Look at futuredoc. He got one month of coaching from Paster and now he's having $30k months. Sick. [/ QUOTE ] 5k/6k is a lot for a NL100 player  how much did paster make?[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I agree people would benefit. But, I don't think you should go spend 5k on coaching all at once. Get a coach for a bit, improve. Play, improve. Get a new coach. Rinse and repeat. I've spent <$4k on coaching. Probably about $1k of that is yet to be earned. Ie, I've paid for it, but haven't had the coaching sessions yet. But, maybe I would have improved quicker. I dunno. But, I think I improve by gradually incorporating what my coach is teaching. Which requires me playing a lot in between coaching sessions to help it sink in. But, maybe that's cause I'm old? 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode