|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: do you think this internet bill will be effective? | |||
| yes |
   
|
32 | 29.09% |
| no |
  
|
51 | 46.36% |
| maybe but not sure |
  
|
27 | 24.55% |
| Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#24
10-29-2007, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i want that fking #1 pick [/ QUOTE ] why? [/ QUOTE ] what the hell kind of question is that? the jets are clearly going to have a top 10 pick, so why not aim for the highest? good god thats the dumbest question ive ever seen in my life [/ QUOTE ] It really isn't. If there's no concensus #1 pick and analagous gaping need associated with that players position, the financial risks associated with that draft slot are worse than say the 2-4. If the Jets want XXXXX, and only XXXX, and XXXX will be gone by #2, fine. But if they can get XXXX at 2 then 2 is the better pick to have. Looking at this year's expected class and the Jets roster, IMO the #1 would not be better than the 2-3, maybe even the 4. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode