![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
stack size isnt enough evidence to rule out cheating IMO
i agree that if a cheater didnt have to worry about people combing thru his hand histories he would most likely be the #1 stack at the table. but if hes trying to stay under the radar, it is more likely that he would maintain a medium stack or slightly above average stack. If the cheater was exercising caution, it would be more difficult to accumulate chips. |
|
|