new more damning absolute evidence

[indianaV8]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think what we need to get the word out is a thorough article that presents the events in a time line and explains their significance and does so in a way your recreational player who's never so much as looked at a HH file can understand. Then this article needs to be put EVERYWHERE.

[/ QUOTE ]

How about something like http://www.absolutepokercheats.com/i...epokercheating

[/ QUOTE ]

Josem I don't want to offend you, but this sounds like a whining player, i.e. "I can't play poker that's why I will make some nice wonderfull colourful introduction so that people believe me thinking that I'm intelligent". Now again, I really don't want to offend you, but to my opinion the first few lines should catch the awarness in undisputable way.

I think it should be something along the lines "The second undisputable exploit in history of online poker is a fact: online hackers take more than 1 million US$ from online poker players"

--> I know now you may come with 101 disagreements - that it wasn't a hack but an internal job, etc: keep this for during the actual article! it's not needed to make all of your points and show all the facts in the first 3 sentences
--> By saying "the second" and undisputable it sounds different than the usual "online poker is rigged story", raise credibility.
--> The presence of 1m$ is also important so that news can pickup and continue reading. I.e. that it's not about "i lost my 25$ buyin to these cheaters" story
--> In [a very short introduction] link to the first such case with planet poker (there is academic paper on that). This will raise credibility, but don't spend more than a sentence on this.

and so on.

OK, Now I'm waiting for all the flames [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img])

But as I said, I didn't think too much publicity is good, but this cannot be prevented any longer.