![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1. The account that won the WCOOP main event was played from the same computer and the same IP from the start of the tournament until the finish. 2. No other account played from this same IP or computer, during the tournament. [/ QUOTE ] Then what's the problem??? Originally it was stated that there was a player playing from the same IP address, he busted out and then his sister won. So the accusation is that after he busted out he took over for the sister and finished playing the game, winning. If they didn't play from the same IP, then why would it even come to being suspicious? Just because it's his sister? I just don't understand why the accusation came out. I'm thinking it's only because it happens to be his sister and thus, RIGGED seems to be the only possible answer to the masses. Innocent, IMO. T [/ QUOTE ] It's clear you don't understand what's going on, the IP thing was just a rumour in the first post as to why he's under investigation. It's widely known that it was him playing the account that won, Stars are just in the process of proving wrong doing by IP methods or otherwise and it sounds like they've managed it. It was quoted earlier ''he is the only **** arrogant enough to put his location as Monte Carlo'' do you really think his sister in her first outing on stars decided to do that? You're extremely naive and I would suggest giving the poker world a very wide berth.... |
|
|