![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] To ZeeJustin: An excerpt from Wikipedia on Jesus "Biblical scholars and classical historians generally accept the historical existence of Jesus, with claims against existence regarded as "effectively refuted." [/ QUOTE ] That settles it! [/ QUOTE ] It's not a meaningful quote anyway, but typical misuse. It's like confusing whether there was an actual Wild Bill Hickok and the one of legend. Some biblical scholars believe that 'jesus of the bible' existed. the one that did strange things to fish and trivialized gravity. THAT is the jesus that influenced some people, the mythological jesus. He would have influenced them whether he existed or not. No non-christian scholars believe that 'jesus of the bible' existed ... Or Else They Would Be Christians. The possible 'poor slob jesus', hut builder, that may have existed never influenced anyone. luckyme |
|
|