![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
STAGE #753361340: HOLDEM NO LIMIT $30 - 2007-09-04 17:27:15 (ET)
Table: ALHAMBRA (Real Money) Seat #3 is the dealer Seat 3 - PTOWNER ($6881 in chips) Seat 4 - THE GRINDER ($5970 in chips) Seat 5 - DOUBLEDRAG ($21702 in chips) Seat 2 - DTON21 ($1110 in chips) THE GRINDER - Posts small blind $15 DOUBLEDRAG - Posts big blind $30 *** POCKET CARDS *** Dealt to PTOWNER [10d 3c] DTON21 - Folds PTOWNER - Folds THE GRINDER - Raises $135 to $150 DOUBLEDRAG - Calls $120 *** FLOP *** [As 4h 8s] THE GRINDER - Bets $180 DOUBLEDRAG - Calls $180 *** TURN *** [As 4h 8s] [6d] THE GRINDER - Checks DOUBLEDRAG - Checks *** RIVER *** [As 4h 8s 6d] [5d] THE GRINDER - Checks DOUBLEDRAG - Bets $5550 THE GRINDER - All-In(Raise) $5640 to $5640 DOUBLEDRAG - Folds THE GRINDER - returned ($90) : not called *** SHOW DOWN *** THE GRINDER - Does not show THE GRINDER Collects $11758 from main pot *** SUMMARY *** Total Pot($11760) | Rake ($2) Board [As 4h 8s 6d 5d] Seat 2: DTON21 Folded on the POCKET CARDS Seat 3: PTOWNER (dealer) Folded on the POCKET CARDS Seat 4: THE GRINDER (small blind) collected Total ($11758) All-In HI $11758) [Does not show] Seat 5: DOUBLEDRAG (big blind) Folded on the RIVER I have no idea what he was thinking in this instance. If he was cheating he could missed grinder having possible s8t and went with one of his ridiculous overbets. Another possibility is he typed in the wrong number and added a 0. But I think this is refuted when after he folded he wrote "wow that was a horrible bluff attempt" What really gets me is how does he not call 90 into a 11k pot... |
|
|