X-Post: Man arrested for not showing officer his License

[Kaj]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
not wrong. Shopkeeper's privilege laws are standard, and every one I found uses one of the two standards. If you disagree, then produce some that have no such laws or use a materially different standard for detention.

[/ QUOTE ]
Post these laws that allow for detainment on grounds of refusal to consent to a bag check alone. I will grant you that some states allow for reasonable cause, but nowhere have I found that not consenting to a bag check constitutes such cause and I've found many, many links to the contrary that state in order to show reasonable/probable cause, store employees must actually witness the attempt to shoplift. So you are still wrong with your first post that said this guy did something wrong until you can produce a single law that allows for detainment based on refusal to consent to a bag check.

[/ QUOTE ]

Copernicus has asserted it be so. No need for him to provide any support to his assertions, even if they are contrary to readily available sources. He's inspired by God and defined as absolute correctness.