![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
So I've been thinking deeply about wonging after last year's success thanx to Dali. What I've been thinking about is the fact that the only book offering even money 2-teamers is 5dimes as far as I know, and they obviously shade the lines to make it look like there are more wongable games than there truly should be. Last year I would often goto Pinny and check out their lines to kind of get a feel for which teams are truly wongable, by using their dropdown menu and choosing the spread closest to -110. However, sometimes this can be difficult, as a lot of their spreads aren't exactly -110, and also sometimes they aren't relatively close to the -110 either. So I was thinking, is there a way to look at the money line, and figure out what the spread would be based on that? Or is it not a linear scale? I was thinking that about 20 points in the money line translates to one point in the spread, but I could be way off, and am probably just over-complicating things. Should I just be going off what the spread is closest to the -110, even if it is like 10 points or so off? [/ QUOTE ] After using this point spread to money line converter, I figured out the following: -7.5 = -295 -8.5 = -385 +1.5 = +120 +2.5 = +145 Does this mean maybe I should try looking for money lines between -295 & -385 and between +120 & +145, and wonging these teams if they are available? Edit: If I go by this, there are four available wongs right now on 5dimes: TEN vs JAC (-300) ATL (+144) vs MIN DET (+123) vs OAK BAL (+124) vs CIN All of the money lines are according to Pinny, and all of these selections cross either the 3 or 7 on 5dimes. However, all of these aren't listed as wongable spreads on Pinny. I think I'm gonna start off small and test out this theory, see how it goes for a couple of weeks. Unless anyone has some further insight into the best way to find out if a team is truly wongable? |
|
|