![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Some of these could still be +EV. A lot of the lines where you tease OFF the key numbers are still +EV, while the ones where you tease ONTO a key number are not (or at least less EV than betting on the spread.) [/ QUOTE ] If I'm not mistaken teasing off or on to a key number is not a true Wong, the tease has to go accross a key number. What I'm trying to get at is - when judging whether a spread is wongable or not does one need to use the "true line" to juge. Or, is it as black and white as just moving the number that a book has posted regardless of what another book has the -110 line set at? |
|
|