Re: \"riggedpoker.com - 100% rigging guaranteed\"
olieovie, I never concluded the site must be rigged because of the data provided. You can check my posts again if you wish. I was commenting on that data only. And that data was not consistent with the hypothesis that the deal was random, that's all. I'm not a conspiracy theorist or anything, hehe.
What I noticed, and that's the reason why I posted, is that the data (OP's AA's that were analyzed already) showed a large deviation, and people said it was ok. For that sample only it was NOT ok. That's all. I only had that data, my own data is much, much smaller than that. I've been playing for a week only. What I did say, is that the data provided was inconsistent with an up and up deck, while people said it was ok. I said I wanted to see more data. Which was kindly provided by uDevil. THAT is consistent. And that has a suited hand way off, more than 3 sigma. That's less than a percent chance, but hey, I have more than a hundred other hands to see. That was my point. Not saying its 2 sigma off therefore its rigged.... its 2 sigma off therefore its inconsistent.
I wonder why people are so agressive here, jesus! Maybe its just me, but I think a forum is for people to express their ideas and discuss them, not call each other stupid (in a literal way) or tell people to shut up... Not to take quotes out of context and say "see, you're stupid". Maybe its a poker player thing.
|