![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] doesn't dawkins have a passage where he talks about being an anarchist until... [/ QUOTE ] You'll have to quote it; I don't recall it. But he has several passages that show his political thinking is nowhere near as clear as his economic thinking. [/ QUOTE ] hmm, then i'd have to find it does it have something to do with riots in canada? [/ QUOTE ] I think that was him quoting someone else. It's come up before on the board. Chris V I think posted it. It was a straightforward fallacy. The local police goes on strike and there is an increase of crime, hence lack of government = crime. Except that the local police have a monopoly of protection, so when they go on strike there is a complete lack of providers, not a competitive free market of providers. |
|
|