Re: \"riggedpoker.com - 100% rigging guaranteed\"
It is just reasonable to doubt that there are any winners who have a 5% rake on their backs, because for that you need an edge against other players of more than 5%, and that happens only against very loose players (e.g. when they play with A3 and Q8 preflop).
And here it gets complicated, as you could blame the rake and the lack of fishes for one's losses, and not cheating.
But in this case of lack of fishes, the 25% of preflop hands should show no expected value as pokeroom.com tables show, and there should be no poker winners! And don’t tell me that you have more than 5% edge against the other players just because of your amazing OTHER poker skills (telepaphy perhaps?) whereas all players fold the same percentage of preflop hands, fold when they have no pot odds, and they are all tight players like Scroodge!
On the other hand, if the fishes are there, then the expected value tables of preflop hands of pokeroom.com are true, and then you do not need 500,000 hands to proove cheating. Just play a few hundred hands of the top preflop hands, subtract the post blinds, take in consideration variance, but the greater the expected value and the losses/hands or $ losses/$ wagered, the less the hands needed for stat proof, and the less the role of variance.
And THERE ARE rooms that are full of fishes (or programs, or players who work for the casino who pretend to be fishes): Sportingbet, 888, bet365, etc.
And definatelly there are some hands with expected value. Even better, when you get two pairs and threes of a kind and higher, then the expected value of these strong hands is even higher that AA preflop, so if you make big losses in e.g. 300 such hands, then this is a proof of cheating my dear affiliates! And this has definatelly happened to me, and many others.
Actually I asked some pokerooms to send me the log files with the hand history, as they are not all saved to this computer, but for various reasons I cannot get them, e.g. I opened the log file of Intercasino with excell, and the results are like chinese, and besides that, devided into too many sections. I am not a computer expert, and pokertracker is as complicated as hell. I am not wealthy to have the time to deticate 2 years of my life to proove cheatery. Obviously other people who can and as experts in stats and probs as me, are already affiliates. I am too surprised that there isnt such a complete recoreded proof yet. And if one has such a proof , why not sell it to the casinos? lol.
|