![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] - A lot of the stuff you guys are trying to interpret as evolutionary biology probably has a strong cultural basis, too. The idea of what a 'real man' is changes from culture to culture and age to age; in the Victorian era, for example, manhood was synonymous with self-restraint, a 'stiff upper lip' and the ability to provide. This is the Age of Baller, and our idealized images have changed accordingly. Plus, a lot of these traits - selfish egoism, complete disregard for the feelings / opinions of others, willingness to move on at the slightest provocation, etc etc., seem like lousy traits for providers & fathers, which makes a purely evolutionary explanation problematic. [/ QUOTE ] This paragraph is very indicative of 2 things. a) You misunderstand just about every aspect of PUA b) You have not been listening to what many people have been saying in this mess of a thread It's really a waste trying to talk to you about it and I think it's really stupid for you to make a thread and then completely ignore all relevant points made. You've done more pointless arguing than you have discussing the topic of the thread. Which leads me to believe you don't want to discuss it at all, so I'm not sure wtf you were doing starting a thread in the first place. [/ QUOTE ] I wanted more specificity. I feel gypped. |
|
|