![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
For the seven millionth time, we don't believe you? If you are so good at picking up girls, why can't you CONTRIBUTE anything to the subject? On any [censored] level at all. Honestly. I read the whole goddamn thread and I think you are a virgin, not that there's anything wrong with that. [/ QUOTE ] Well, you're retarded; not that there's anything wrong with that. Picking up girls, in the practical how-to sense, is not what prompted me to write the OP. I'm just gonna restate my original questions. 1) Take the theoretical, stereotypical PUA critic, sort of a mock-up of the stock criticisms. The guy who won't / can't pick up some random club girls on a regular basis, but at the same time justifies his unwillingness / inability to do so for moral reasons. If he can't pull it off anyway, is there any actual merit to his whole song-and-dance about 'I don't choose to behave that way,' or is it just a cop-out? Is there any actual merit, from a moral standpoint, in refusing to do something that one would likely not be able to pull off in the first place? 2) Assume the simplified version of the PUA universe-as-applied-to-women is valid: All Women Are Like This, This Is What They Want, Do This Or Become A Monk. (This assumption is kind of a stretch.) Suppose, furthermore, God Himself came down from Heaven, put His Finger in your face and said: My Son, PUA is Unlawful In My Sight. Your choices are to be 'bad' and bang MAWs, or be 'good' and live a lifetime of frustration and lowered expectations. Which do you choose? Why? Which is better? Why? |
|
|