![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok i saw cwar actually folding A7o in the BB in his hu video vs a 3xbb raise.
Obviously hes a great player so i think might underestimate the reverse implied odds concept. But heres my thought about BB defend.. Lets say you call with A7o, KTo 22-55 etc. 15% and reraise with AT+, 66+ and sometimes other stuff to 10% So you are acutally folding 75% of the time! My point here is that i get far too much value in the small Blind by simply raising any 2 cards. lets say i get 72o in the sb, hows my value of raising: 75% of the time i gain 1bb so thats +0.75bb value 10% of the time i loose 3bb so thats -0.3bb value 15% of the time i see a flop with as a hopeless underdog, but in position, but i still have at least 33% equity of the 6bb pot = 2bb = loss of 1bb = -0.15bb value. So thats 0.3 bb raising value of 72o instead of loosing the 0.5 bb by folding of course! In a perfect world i would imagine raising 72o isnt profitable, with that underdefend its superprofitable. Vs an Opponent that limps the button quite a bit an seldom raises it i think its ok to fold A7. But an Opponent that comes in for a 3xbb raise as Standard and raises about 50% of his cards lets say, you got with A2o 50% equity of the pot. Folding looses 1bb. So heres my question is the reverse implied odds really making up that much? I cant really imagine that. |
|
|