Better Restated Abortion Question

[luckyme]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If technology advances to the point where even young embryos can be saved after an abortion, will pro choicers claim woman will have the right to tell the surgeons not to save it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. People have abortions because they do not want a specific potential person to become an actual person.

Stu

[/ QUOTE ]

I laughed at you in the other thread, I'm laughing at you now. Keep it up, though, you are on a roll.

[/ QUOTE ]

When you stop laughing, you'll look around and see everyone else staring at you funny. If it isn't already obvious to you yet, your pro-choice stance, and the one that DS caricatured in his other post, is in the minority -- at least in the replies on this thread, and almost certainly in society at large.

[/ QUOTE ]

The point is that DS and Stu's statements are far past caricatures. It's not the "hey, let's kill a baby today" that has women choosing an abortion it is variations of -
- I don't want to go through the pregnancy.
- I don't want to be a mother.
- I don't want the responsibility of raising a child.etc.

If we could offer a woman, " your fetus will be painlessly removed, it's DNA altered so it's not traceable to you and transplanted into a wealthy caring french women" do DS and Stu really believe that they'll be faced with "Hell no? Kill it now !" gimme a break.

The 'urge to kill something' claim is laughable ( if it wasn't so sad).

luckyme