![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
To clarify, were you mid-stakes pros already trying to manipulate the pot so that the ratios (smallest stack to pre-flop pot size) were in the range you wanted? I've known concepts like min-raising (to effectively up the stakes), flat-calling to keep the pots small, etc., etc. but hadn't ever thought of trying to keep the pot size in proportion to the remaining stacks within a particular range. I guess I'd never seen this discussed before (though I haven't been actively reading the strategy forums this past year). [/ QUOTE ] Bingo. I was generally aware of building pots and exercising pot control and implied odds, but I had not thought explicitly of stack to pot ratios, nor what types of hands preferred what ratios for what purposes. Same for "pot-committed." I generally knew when someone was committed, but the commitment threshhold and planning hands around it is new to me. Really good stuff. |
|
|