![]() |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
First, do you understand the concept that 'transitional forms' is a nonsense term, [/ QUOTE ] I was going to investigate this idea further before posting on it but since you brought it up: Doesn't this make Darwinism unfalsifiable? Before you tell me about rabbits in the Cambrian, I obviously mean on a realistic basis. Whatever form you show me that you claim is transitional I can claim is a separate species. BTW, this idea was what I was pursing with the phylogeny/homology thread that got chopped up so bad: how do you determine a form is transitional, especially if morphology produces errors? |
|
|