![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is my final input to any of your posts. IMO you overthink and overcomplicate simple things and refuse to accept that others may be right.
I disagree with your ranges. [ QUOTE ] So, we have 27 hands where he now has a Pair or will pair his Jack on the River and call: 66/77/99;(18) A8s;(2) QTs;(2) QJs;(2) 98s;(3) [/ QUOTE ] What about KJ and AJ? While he may fold those a lot of ppl at 0.5/1 will call the turn. Assuming he will never play AT and KT this way is 100% wrong using Dan's terminology What about A8o and K8s? [ QUOTE ] We have x hands that are drawing to a Flush going into the River and will ck/raise the River: A6s-A9/AJs-AKs = 7 (I assume that he would not slowplay TPTK when his Top Pair is vulnerable to a K/Q/J) K7s-K9s/KJs/KQs = 5 (again, not slowplaying Top Pair) JTs =1 98s = 1 Total Flush draws: 14 [/ QUOTE ] here you assume he peels with K7hh but above you dont think he has K8s? (no hearts) [ QUOTE ] Then there is 88 (3) [/ QUOTE ] Has to be discounted for not c/r'ing the turn [ QUOTE ] and JTs (4) [/ QUOTE ] So he would play JTs this way but not AT? Make up your mind whether he will c/r his TP or not on the flop. [ QUOTE ] We'll also say he'll call with 1/2 of his AK hands, praying that is what we have. [/ QUOTE ] I think its safe to assume that AK as well as AQ is in his calling range on the river. Discounted yes. But he will be calling them sometimes. EDIT: No its not close. But keep convincing yourself that it is. 1 MORE EDIT: there is only 2 ways he can have JTs. Look at the board [ QUOTE ] K7s-K9s/KJs/KQs = 5 (again, not slowplaying Top Pair) [/ QUOTE ] There are only 3 of those. K7hh, K9hh and KQhh. The Jh and 8h are on the board |
|
|