![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sorry but I do find it interesting (read: hypocritical) that the same person that said this:
[ QUOTE ] ...instead of us all acting as armchair quarterbacks. [/ QUOTE ] is the same person that said this, a few posts earlier: [ QUOTE ] thats incorrect, she is "disclosing trade secrets", and if this is included in her employment contract (it usually is) then she has abused the employee/employer relationship. [/ QUOTE ] You stated the second quoted portion as a fact (i.e. "she IS disclosing", versus, "she MIGHT be disclosing". Perhaps your call to Casino Control should have been made prior to accusing her of "disclosing trade secrets," but that is beside the point. More importantly, "disclosing information about a casino customer's habits" and "disclosing trade secrets" are NOT the same thing. Are you recinding your accusation that she "disclosed trade secrets" by publishing the fact that she got stiffed? |
|
|