![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What cardrooms comes to mind when you think B&M | |||
| I have small local mini-cardrooms in my state |
|
30 | 29.70% |
| My buddy vinnie or Guido's house |
|
1 | 0.99% |
| Tropicana,Sands,Taj Mahal |
|
11 | 10.89% |
| Wynn, Mirage, Bellagio |
|
54 | 53.47% |
| Oldschool Binions |
|
5 | 4.95% |
| Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Q#10:
This question is obviously meant to contrast w/ Q#9: Q#9: [ QUOTE ] 5/10 NL Cash game. 6 handed. Everyone has about $2,000. A passive middle position player raises to $40. Button re-raises to $70. You are in the BB and have: 8s8c. What should you do? [/ QUOTE ] Q#10: [ QUOTE ] 5/10 NL Cash game. 9 handed. Everyone has about $1,000. Unknown middle position raises to $40. Tight player on the button re-raises to $140. You are in the BB and have: AsQs. What should you do? [/ QUOTE ] 1) 9-handed, not 6-handed. -- More players = greater chance you are dominated. Short handed = play more loose. 2) 100BB stacks, not 200BB stacks. -- Deeper stacks = play more loose (implied odds increase). 3) Unknown MP, not passive MP. -- Passive player less likely to re-raise. 4) Tight button, not unknown button. -- Tight player less likely to re-raise without a very strong hand. 5) Button pot-sized raise, not min-raise. -- Button more likely to have a real hand, not just isolating. 6) Pocket 88, not AQs. -- Pocket pair has set value even if dominated by a higher pair. AQs is worth very little if dominated. I said fold. You have a decent chance of being dominated here with opponent likely holding: AK, QQ, KK, AA. |
|
|