christians FTW.

[Tree Surgeon]

I love this site. At one moment they ridicule carbon-dating as totally subjective and unscientific:

‘Why do geologists still use radiometric dating? Wouldn’t they have abandoned the method long ago if it was so unreliable?’



And the next moment they are using carbon-dating to argue against evolution:

"With Leakey’s words still ringing in my ears, The New York Times reported three days later that scientists had re-examined two major fossil sites in Java, and found that [censored] erectus may have lived there as recently as “27,000 years ago”. (December 13, P.A1) This dating analysis, conducted by McMaster University geologists Henry Schwarcz and Jack Rink, will serve to cast further doubt on the so-called evidence for human evolution. Why? If it can be shown that [censored] erectus lived at the same time as modern man, [censored] erectus may be no more than racial variants of [censored] sapiens."