Re: Obvious Collusion at the Canterbury Club (Long -Cliff Notes at bot
The problem with this thread is not BikesB's accusation of collusion between the two players. Maybe they were colluding, maybe not. Whatever. I don't think we'd be all hot and lathered now if that's all BB had said.
The problem is the opening began with a flatout, blatant accusation that PokerBob is cheating. That he's either in on it, or knows it is going on and is ignoring it and intentionally letting poor unsuspecting 2+2 visitors get fleeced. "then he is either involved or has decided not to let anyone know."
Could you BE any more socially idiotic? Seriously, WTH? You lose a rack and start throwing around accusations of collusion at not just the two players you think are colluding, but at everybody who plays there. Did PBob do something at the table to seriously annoy you? You have some vendetta you're trying to settle on 2+2? I just cannot fathom this leap from "I got cheated by two guys playing together" to "it's PBob's fault".
|