![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] which actually brings me to another point that I was going to bring up before you asked this, is there any crime for which a person should be locked up (used loosely- use your imagination) if they have less than a 50% chance of guilt? [/ QUOTE ] Interesting question. It has to be where protection of society and/or deterrence is of such an overiding objective, as opposed to punishment. So I'm thinking war-related; spying; treason. Where they can be locked up for a (long) while on 20% suspicion, then tried more thoroughly at a more convenient time. [/ QUOTE ] Nice work - you've just described the status quo. |
|
|