Question on raising/"one chip rule"

[mikech]

this was you earlier in the thread: "That may be a stretch... but that's why I play a lawyer in real life."

now: "The fact is, if the last significant chip is necessary for a call and is also sufficient to constitute a raise, it is considered a call."

when the hell did this become "fact"?

you are "that person" that develops an interpretation of a rule and thinks your interpretation is gospel when in FACT it's just, like, your opinion, man.