Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-31-2007, 04:50 AM
donger donger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,531
Default Re: Obvious Collusion at the Canterbury Club (Long -Cliff Notes at bot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

You'd have to play a ridiculous amount of hours or get absurdly lucky to make a living playing at this limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

that or just be good at poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah... but even a winning player who books a win at 2 out of 3 or even 3 out of 4 sessions,

[/ QUOTE ]

this statement shows a fundamental lack of understanding about being a pro. 'book a win'????

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah... I understand the hourly rate of return.. one big bet an hour... blah blah blah

however, in a very aggressive game like that... I think you have to have a certain standard deviation threshold... a max up and/or down for a day / session that you are ready / willing to reach.

That's what I'm referring to you.

Would you be willing to disclose what your hourly rate is in that game? I'm sure you keep great stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

w

t

f

?

and yes I log every session of every game I play and no I will not say my winrate in that game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Will you at least divulge your standard deviation quit threshold? Every poker player has one.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.