![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Secondly I vehemently disagree with chezlaw. If we did start putting a number on chances of guilt in whodonit cases, what possible reason is there not to specify what those chances should be in a juror's mind for various crimes? In chezlaws's scenario you could have a hung jury because eleven voted to convict each of whom thought the chances of innocence was 2% while another voted to acquit thinking there was only a one percent chance of innocence. Because he thought one percent was enough. Even worse would be the jury that should be "hung", but isn't, because the one jury member who thinks there is a 25% chance of innocence doesn't believe that he should vote to acquit. [/ QUOTE ] You do occasional come over a bit authoritarian don't you? People act as they think right not as others (even you) think is right. I think many (including me) are happy with the idea of some sort of majority process. chez |
|
|