![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] whoops i did say no PMs. fine im not answering my pms. good catch beebs [/ QUOTE ] So, just wondering, stakes for nl 10 are basically a waste of time for you, because any money that could be won is insignificant to you...right? [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] i mean not necessarily, but most of these nl 10 people dont have a lot of positive stats to throw out (from what i've seen at least). if theres someone out there with good 10nl stats and some trustworthyness i would have no problem bumping them right up to 50nl. its not a big difference. [/ QUOTE ] Well, the argument I was trying to make (for my stakeage) is that almost anybody who even skims over the microstakes forum can beat nl 10. What I was saying is that, even though I cannot prove it, I have deposited 3 times and 15+ buyins before the inevitable 5+ buyin swing, where I thought the world was over and played games that were way over my roll. I don't think that many people can understand variance and BR management the first time, but I have lost my money 3 times and I am almost 100% positive that I now know the significance of them. But for someone staking 400 nl, what would be the point in getting 50% of someone winning only a few ptBB/100 at nl 10? Anyway, let me know. It would be nice. An added measure of safety with my BR would be knowing that I am playing with someone else's money, which would be beneficial for both me and you. |
|
|