|
|
#13
05-19-2007, 12:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: canterbury win rate
[ QUOTE ]
200-hour sample size is too small... At least 1000 hours, better 2000 hours, to be statistically meaningful. [/ QUOTE ] So in order for someone to have a statistically meaningful record of how good a player they are/what their winrate is, they'd have to play eight hours a day five days a week for a whole year? At the same limit? 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode