![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since I cant find a convenient "scorecard" on RP, I'll assume wiki is correct about these positions:
Letters of Marque and Reprisal against individual terrorists-tantamount to continuation of the Clinton policy to treat them as criminals, ignores their sources of funding and sanctuary-awful Against Patriot Act - awful Abolish Dept of Homeland Security - sure For withdrawal from UN and other orgs that diminish US sovereignty - good Against torture - depends on his definition of torture Abuse of executive authority - that would change if he were ever elected Free trade - good Strong stance on illegals - good Abolition of the Fed, Austrian economics, return to gold standard - disasterous Taxes - good Elimination of most cabinet departments - and do what with their responsibilities? Eliminaton of electoral college but strengthen the role of states? Yeah-the big states, like Tx, at the expense of small states Pro-life - who cares Against capital punishment - bad Gay rights - who cares Health care relief - hows it going to be paid for? Drug laws - he says its not a Federal issue..so is it a state issue? prohibition doesnt work...legalize? wiki isnt clear enough on his positions So, on balance, he's a disaster on homeland security and defense and on economics; good on taxes and immigration; mixed on a bunch of extraneous garbage that are unlikely to ever change. Theres a lot better out there. |
|
|