![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Curtains, I am with you here, but I think your example was way off. A better would be drunk driving. How many have friends (or themselves) who drink and drive? If you drink and drive you are 100x worse than JJ or ZJ. If you know someone who does, and dont turn them in, you are 1000000 x worse than curtains or Shane. Lets get back on some more average sized horses for a little while. [/ QUOTE ] Whilst I look the other etc on occasions etc this example does not hold. In this example the drunk driver drives drunk, but only potentialy put others at risk. If this potential is realised e.g. they hit someone I would report them. If it is not then I probably wouldnt comment. I do allow friends to do things that put others at risk and maybe I shouldnt. However I would consider myself a total scumbag if a friend did actualy harm someone via this risk and then I continued to just stand bye. I would inform the relevant authorities if they were not allready cognisant of the situation. In the ZJ case, ZJ and other multiple accounters are in fact doing harm to others. They are the drunk drivers that have in fact hit the kid to use your illustration. The harm risk has been realised. I do not look the other way when people act in such a way that another person becomes an actual realised victim rather than just a potential one. I think this is fairly standard. ZJ entering multiple accounts into the same MTT creates multiple victims. That is as clear as day. |
|
|