![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Here's a thought. This is the plain text from the Senate version that has passed. "However, a cardroom operator may conduct games of Texas Hold-em without a betting limit if the required player buy-in is no more than $100." It seems to me that technically this could open the door for buy-ins greater than $100. Say for instance a cardroom lets you buy-in for anywhere from $100-$300. In that case no player is required to buy-in for more than $100. I don't think that is the spirit of the law but I wouldn't be surprised to see someone try it. [/ QUOTE ] This is exactly how this reads to me. The reguired players buy in should be the minimum. The house should be able to set the maximum where they want since the player is not required to buy in for that amount. [/ QUOTE ] I can't imagine that's what was intended, but that's how it reads to me. |
|
|