Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 04-19-2007, 05:42 PM
mosdef mosdef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,414
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
For some set of criteria to be a right, it has to be objective.

This does not mean that which criteria are rights and which are not is objective.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, I think I know where you're coming from. Please let me know if I have it right:

You are saying that since it is only my opinion that my chance of being harmed has gone up due to your gun, I can't claim that it is violating my rights. If you shot me, I could say that you violated my rights because I could point at the wound and say "there it is, I'm harmed" and that would be objectively observed. I would be appealing to my right to not be harmed by you, and I would be able to objectively demonstrate it.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.