![]() |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Metetron, here's a little quick and dirty analysis of why I wouldn't use equities for the "how much do I need to never work again" scenario. It's not exact because I'm in the living room on my roommate's laptop and it doesn't have excel, so this is the best I could do in Google Docs without wasting a ton of time.
I took the returns of every 12 month sample of the S&P 500 going back to 1950. To be clear, April 06-April 07 is one sample, March 06-March 07 is another. So each month gets counted 12 times. This probably isn't statistically perfect, but it's a close enough approximation for not having excel. Average return: 8.3% Standard deviation: 14.8% Positive "years": 491 Negative "years: 185 Winning:Losing: 2.67:1 % losing: 27.4% Let's call 5% our benchmark long term risk free rate.. Z score: (x-m)/s=(.05-.083)/.148=-.22 Cumulative normal distribution: 41.2% the return of equities will be less than the risk free rate Falling below the benchmark rate is a big deal in a scenario, like this one, where you're withdrawing money every month or year. It's not just an issue of catastrophic disaster. |
|
|