![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Samsung 204B or Dell 2007WFP | |||
| Dell 2007WFP |
|
5 | 35.71% |
| Samsung 204B |
|
9 | 64.29% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone explain to me the concept of 'Sklansky Bucks'? Or link me to a thread ? I'd appreciate it . . [/ QUOTE ] Alright Ill try this before I go to bed. I'm not sure if this is techinically the definition, but its what Sklansky's getting at. Say youre playing 50nl and effective stacks are exactly $50. You and one opponent see a flop in the blinds for $.50 each thus a $1 pot. Dont worry about open limping in the SB and all that, you both see a flop for $.50. Now this is a good flop and you are exactly a 2:1 favorite (66.67% to win). You and your opponent get AI on this flop somehow (once again it doesnt matter what the action is, youre just AI), pot=$100 assume no rake. .6667*100=+$66.67 for the times that you win .3333*(-100)=-$33.33 for the time you lose Add them up and your $Ev=+33.34. So regardless of what the actual outcome is, everytime you get it in on this flop as a 2:1 fav for 100bb, you win $33.34 sklansky bux. Usually people talk about making sklansky bux when they get sucked out on in this situation (they really lost $100 bc of the suckout but made $33.34 in sklansky bux). |
|
|