Interesting take on Poker Pros (Part II)

[CraigJ]

[ QUOTE ]
Why is that a great point, though??? Okay, yes, if Ivey were the unluckiest person in the world, he'd perform poorly. So what? He's successful, so obviously he's not the unluckiest person in the world. How does that prove the implication that luck has everything to do with Ivey??? Doesn't make any sense.


[/ QUOTE ]

I think you just restated my point.

"He's successful, so obviously he's not the unluckiest person in the world."

And I never said luck had EVERYTHING to do with Ivey. I said the most dominant player you could find would be the most skilled and most lucky. Is Ivey the most skilled and most lucky? I don't know but I bet he is ranking high in both areas.