![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I believe the top US facing sites still have a strong enough core of non-US business to withstand most anything tossed their way (barring a marine raid on PokerStars headquarters/datacenter or something). [/ QUOTE ] Full Tilt and UB would barely survive without the US. Stars would be just fine. It appears that a site can go on just fine with 2,000 peak players. What remains to be seen if for long - fish will go broke, money will need to be deposited, ie growth is unnecessary. it's not sufficient in any business to remain stagnant. Sniper -what biz model did Absolute change? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not convinced that FT/UB would go under without the US... on what basis do you make this statement? (convince me that you know something that I haven't thought about) As for Absolute's business model changes, you can find links to the discussion in the big Site Tracking thread, just scroll back a bit. Basically, they changed their bonus clearing methodology, and their MGR calculations for US players. [/ QUOTE ] Personally, I would put the "sites that might be in trouble without the US" bar right below FTP, rather than right above it. [/ QUOTE ] yes of course I agree. but, many sites below FTP have already stopped taking US players. this is part of the reason why they are below FTP now - sites like Pacific, Paradise, Crpyto, and Ongame might be in the same ballpark (now) as FTP had they not already backed out. |
|
|