Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 02-13-2007, 10:11 PM
Anders Anders is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: regressing to the mean
Posts: 2,023
Default Re: How My Son\'s Insight May Have Saved Poker

People are conflating "skill-based game" with "game it is possible to win at in the long run." Blackjack absolutely IS a skill-based game, although impossible to win in the long run (yeah, okay, assume the deck is reshuffled every hand).

Me pitching a curveball to Derek Jeter is a skill based game too, but I absolutely will not win it in the long run.

So, the blackjack example does not defeat Sklansky's theorem here, because skill is a factor in blackjack - skill ultimately decides how quickly you will lose. If Jeter homers off of me 70 times out of 100, that doesn't mean it was out of my control.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.