blitzing on third and long and the problem with poker forum advice

[pete fabrizio]

[ QUOTE ]
TSo this bluffing into a dry side pot thing isn't really a very good example, because it's not an example of an "optimal" or "equilibrium" solution - it's an example of perturbing the (three-player Nash) equilibrium solution by threatening to transfer equity from one guy to the other in order to make the threatened guy pay you.

[/ QUOTE ]

So basically this "isn't really a very good example" because it doesn't fit into the narrowly contrived parameters that make the math work out all pretty.