![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I disagree for a lot of reasons, but I think it comes down to this: I agree 84o is a terrible hand, but many of the biggest pots I have ever won have been with terrible starting hands that flopped well-disguised hands (like 2-pair). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not sure if you're talking about this hand, but your 2 pair hand was not at all well disguised. Whenever a blind checkraises I assume that a random 2 pair (SB or BB special) is in their range. You pretty much defined your hand by checkraising here, but the guy you stacked happens to be a donkey who can't read hands/lay down aces. How could he push all-in after a bet, a call, and a CR out of the blinds? Clearly the guy sucks. [/ QUOTE ] I meant in general. In this case I agree with you. Btw, a lot of times I will lead out with 2-pair, in this case I did not. And yes, this guy is a donkey for playing it like he did. If it weren't for the other info he gave me, I would have folded. [ QUOTE ] At least you practice good game selection. [/ QUOTE ] I try. I'm don't play for ego, or the thrill of beating a great player. I play to win money. I would much rather play against a bunch of donks than good players. [ QUOTE ] This is not at all true assuming competent players. If you are playing against clueless calling stations who will not fold any pair, then your analysis makes more sense. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, but as I said, against a solid player I would have folded pretty quickly. There are a lot of donks out there... |
|
|