Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 01-20-2007, 10:11 AM
tangled tangled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 318
Default Re: TrueCEO

[ QUOTE ]


The distinction is that an entity which is in the business of betting or wagering falls under the UIEG Act. That is not a poker business model.

Secondly, the UIGE Act covers deposits, not cashouts.



[/ QUOTE ]

But a financial institution is not going to make that distinction in whatever policy they come up with towards gambling sites. Neteller, the friendliest of all financial institutions to us, will not.

Your second point that UIGEA only applies to deposits not cashouts seems solid and on point.

I am not trying to flame you. I think it is courageous that you have stayed with the US player. Thank you. But this thread was about cashing checks from poker sites. Relentlessly restating a talking point that does not apply to that question is not helpful.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.