![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I gotta get off this thread, lol. One myth I think that deserves examining, also, is the "Martial Arts Master". Not unlike the boxer who can lay you out with one punch, the Martial Arts Master goes one better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZuJBsIWl_k [/ QUOTE ] That was funny as hell. The whole time I was just picturing what would happen if I time warped a Lewis, Fedor, or hell for giggles an Ortiz into that ring (talk about styles making fights with the last one). People are talking past each other too much here. The two of possible contention are boxer and mma but the only argument for boxer is that they self select for more money. But that ignores the fact that they have inevitably trained for a very limited form of combat. We are not starting from a blank slate here. Anyone who makes such a claim for the boxer would inevitably have to support the laughable Urlacher takes Bas in a street fight argument. MMA unless the SEAL has a gun or a radio. J |
|
|