Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > Special Sklansky Forum
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 12-13-2006, 08:45 AM
WelshMackem WelshMackem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Accrington, UK
Posts: 102
Default Re: Moderate Muslims and Catholics-Nice But Dumb?

[ QUOTE ]
You are right I should have said that Atheism is illogical and irrational.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not so, if any of the popularly supported religion's views of "their" god were to hold true, why would we believe that such an all loving, all singing, all dancing big fella would value the soul of a mass murderer who happens to claim a belief in Him above that of an honest, hard working, considerate person who doesn't? THAT is illogical and irrational.

[ QUOTE ]
If I believe in ANY religion that advocates eternal life I have a better chance mathmatically of living forever in "heaven" than someone who doesn't believe in anything.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ignoring Pascal's wager, this argument is still flawed. Following this "logic", you should immediately rule out Judaism as a potential religion to feign belief in, since (as far as I'm aware) Judaism has no requirement to follow its tenets or affirm its belief system in order to secure one's eternal salvation, therefore expressing a belief in Judaism simply reuces your chances of being saved.

Further than any of this, to suggest that following (or in your case pretending to follow) a religion is in any way logical, is possibly the least logical comment on this thread - to paraphrase - I don't believe there is a God, but just in case I'm wrong I'm going to try to pull the wool over the eyes of one possible manifestation of him/her/it, because if there is a god he's probably either too stupid or too busy to see through my paper thin ruse.

Another thing to bear in mind is that the Bible was written some time after the supposed miraculous events of Jesus's life/death and then "revised" on numerous occasions when "new interpretations/evidence" came to light. What on earth would make anyone think that following the doctrine of a book re-written several times through the ages to support the then political position of the Vatican (or in the case of protestantism, the wish of the English monarch to get divorced and sleep around a bit more without being damned for eternity) would gain any favour in the eyes of the big guy?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.